AIPlayPark Rating

How we score AI tools

Every listing uses the same weighted rubric so you can compare apples to apples. We score C1–C6 on a 0–10 scale, then combine them with the weights below.

Rating formula

rating = (C1 * 0.30) + (C2 * 0.25) + (C3 * 0.15) + (C4 * 0.15) + (C5 * 0.10) + (C6 * 0.05)

Scale: 0.0 (low) … 10.0 (best-in-class)

Criterion breakdown

Effectiveness for Its Primary Use Case

Does the tool consistently deliver on the problem it advertises?

30%

Score: 10.0Contribution: 3.00

Adoption & Trust Signals

Do customers, institutions, or educators rely on it?

25%

Score: 9.0Contribution: 2.25

Safety & Reliability

Is the experience dependable, ethical, and safe for its audience?

15%

Score: 9.0Contribution: 1.35

Accessibility & Ease of Use

How fast can someone adopt it, regardless of experience level?

15%

Score: 10.0Contribution: 1.50

Price-to-Value Ratio

Is the tiering sensible and does it deliver measurable value?

10%

Score: 9.0Contribution: 0.90

Innovation & Momentum

Is the roadmap active, and do users notice steady improvements?

Score: 6.0Contribution: 0.30

Example: Photomath

Tallying our scores for a proven math tutor shows how the weights pull a best-in-class tool toward a 9+ rating.

9.3 / 10

Each public listing includes the actual C1–C6 scores so you can see how your favourite tools earn that overall rating.